ACTA's Must-Reads
« Baruch disses freshman academic freedom | Main | Theorizing Kevin Barrett »
Dartmouth's arrogance goes national--again
For months, ACTA has been covering--and challenging--the Dartmouth alumni association's outrageous efforts to silence dissent, consolidate its own authority, and prevent "outsiders" from getting elected to the College's board of trustees. Meanwhile, Dartmouth has been unmoved by appeals to reason, fairness, and democratic process--despite unfavorable coverage in The New York Times, the Boston Globe, and other major news outlets.
Now Dartmouth is in the news again, the continuing arrogance and shameful behavior of its officers having earned it a prime location in this morning's Wall Street Journal:
The left-leaning faction that dominates American higher education doesn't take kindly to strangers -- particularly those who challenge the prevailing academic orthodoxies. Just ask Harvard's Larry Summers.Or consider the escalating governance controversy at Dartmouth College. A few reformers have achieved a bit of influence, and now the New Hampshire school's insular establishment is doing everything it can to run them out of Hanover.
Since 1891, Dartmouth has been among the handful of colleges and universities that allows alumni to elect leaders directly. At present, eight of the 18 members of the governing Board of Trustees are chosen by the popular vote of some 66,500 graduates, from a slate nominated by a small, mostly unelected committee. (The remaining seats, reserved for major donors, are filled by appointment.)
In practice, the Trustees have been largely ornamental overseers, rubber-stamping the management decisions of the "progressive" college administration and faculty. The passivity of the Trustees owes, in part, to the fact that many official alumni representatives operate as a de facto wing of the establishment, pushing candidates who won't make trouble.
In 2004 and 2005, however, Dartmouth alumni were finally offered genuine choices. Over three successive Trustee contests, independent candidates bypassed the official channels and got onto the ballot by collecting alumni signatures. Each of the petition candidates -- T.J. Rodgers, a Silicon Valley CEO; Peter Robinson, a former Reagan speechwriter and current Hoover Institution fellow; and Todd Zywicki, a law professor -- ran on explicit platforms emphasizing academic standards, free speech and Dartmouth's acute leadership crisis. All three were unexpectedly elected by wide margins despite intense institutional opposition. Not only did the trend give expression to the general alumni discontent over how Dartmouth is being run (a rare thing in academia), but a critical mass was also building for more muscular stewardship, and, with it, fundamental change.
Dartmouth's inner circles, quite naturally, loathe all of this. And so the Alumni Council -- the representative body of sorts for the whole -- decided there was nothing to be done but change the rules. At issue is a new proposed constitution, cooked up in 2004 and constantly altered in response to events, that would "reform" the incorporation of the Trustees.
Most of the details are too tedious to go into here, but the new document is plainly designed to prevent outsiders from gaining still more Trusteeships.
They say there's no such thing as bad publicity--but perhaps Dartmouth would disagree.
Posted by acta online on September 01, 2006 at September 1, 2006 08:59 AM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.goactablog.org/blog/mt-tb.cgi/212